Home Chemistry A uncommon case of brominated small molecule acceptors for high-efficiency natural photo voltaic cells

A uncommon case of brominated small molecule acceptors for high-efficiency natural photo voltaic cells

A uncommon case of brominated small molecule acceptors for high-efficiency natural photo voltaic cells


Physicochemical properties

Three SMAs of CH20, CH21 and CH22 might be efficiently synthesized in accordance with our beforehand developed technique21 with a superb yield in every step, whereas the artificial and characterization particulars have been offered within the Supplementary Strategies, Supplementary Figs. 125 and Supplementary Knowledge 1. Typically, a fascinating A-D-A structure might be indicated by plots of frontier orbital cost density variations (ΔQ) alongside molecular skeletons with a transparent peak-valley-peak form (Supplementary Fig. 26) for all three SMAs55. Word that SMAs with such an A-D-A structure are anticipated to own improved mild harvesting and cost era/transport dynamics, diminished power losses and thus enlarged PCEs in ensuing OSCs in comparison with different sort molecules1,2,38,56,57. In good accordance with our discussions above, the isotropic polarizability of phenazine cores will increase regularly with the introduction of bromine, being 146.28 with out bromine, 166.26 with one bromine and 185.01 with two bromines (Fig. 1b). This tendency might be additionally discovered within the ensuing SMAs, displaying stepwise enlarged polarizability from CH20 to CH22 (Supplementary Fig. 27). As well as, the polarizability of dibrominated phenazine can also be bigger than these of its difluorinated and dichlorinated analogs (Fig. 1b).

The most important dipole moments have been additionally noticed for each dibrominated phenazine and CH22 with respect to their counterparts (Supplementary Figs. 27 and 28). It’s price noting that CH22 contributes to a bigger relative dielectric fixed (εr) of three.32 than that of two.00 for CH20 and a couple of.35 for CH21 (Supplementary Fig. 29). This might be ascribed to each the enlarged molecular polarizability and dipole second of CH22 evaluating with these of CH20 and CH21. The elevated εr of natural semiconductors is conducive to attain facilitated cost switch/transport dynamics and thus provides rise to a greater OSC with amplified FF and JSC58,59. Moreover, based mostly on the differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves in Supplementary Fig. 30a, CH20, CH21 and CH22 exhibit exothermal peaks at 241.5, 253.9 and 286.8 °C, respectively, comparable to a melting enthalpy (ΔHm) of 16.3 for CH20, 17.1 for CH21 and 23.3 J g1 for CH22. The bigger ΔHm of CH22 than these of CH20 and CH21 suggests its stronger molecular interactions60, which will likely be mentioned intimately beneath.

To judge the consequences of central unit brominating on light-harvesting capacities, the electron absorption spectra of SMAs have been recorded. As introduced in Fig. 1c, the utmost absorption peaks (λmax) of CH21 and CH22 dissolved in chloroform are at 733 and 729 nm, barely hypochromic shift by 7 and 11 nm, respectively, in comparison with that of 740 nm for CH20. Furthermore, CH21 and CH22 exhibit enlarged molar absorption coefficients of two.13 × 105 and a couple of.20 × 105 L mol1 cm1 compared to that of two.04 × 105 L mol1 cm1 for CH20, which is perhaps ascribed to the suppressed spin prohibition of Q bands in CH21 and CH2250. An apparent red-shifting of λmax might be noticed from options to stable movies for all of the three SMAs (Fig. 1d), implying sturdy intermolecular interactions in stable states61,62. The HOMO and LUMO of CH20, CH21 and CH22 afforded by cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements might be calculated as −5.61/−3.80 eV, −5.63/−3.80 eV and −5.67/−3.83 eV, respectively (Fig. 1e and Supplementary Fig. 31). Clearly, the regularly downshifted HOMOs must be ascribed to the introduction of electronegative bromine on central unit/donor of SMAs. In the meantime, the power gaps derived from CVs might be calculated as 1.36, 1.37 and 1.39 eV for CH20, CH21 and CH22, respectively. The regularly enlarged power gaps agree properly with the blue-shifted λonset as talked about above (Fig. 1d). Please be aware that the downshifted HOMO of CH22 will end in a comparatively bigger driving drive for cost separation than CH20 and CH21 when the identical donor is utilized (Fig. 1f). The relative alignments of HOMO and LUMO agree properly the tendency rendered by density practical idea (DFT) calculations (see Supplementary Word 1 and Supplementary Fig. 32).

As proven in Supplementary Fig. 30b, all three SMAs possess glorious thermal stability, indicated by a excessive decomposition temperature of greater than 330 °C. Furthermore, all three SMAs additionally exhibit glorious photostability, indicated by their UV-vis spectra. As proven in Supplementary Figs. 33 and 34, the form and depth of absorption spectra show virtually no adjustments after getting older for over 550 h underneath one solar illumination63. Concurrently, the photostability of CH22 was additional confirmed by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. There isn’t a change earlier than and after getting older for over 450 h underneath one solar illumination (Supplementary Fig. 35), which means that the introduction of C-Br bonds doesn’t lower the photostability of acceptors64. The superb thermal stability and photostability of those three SMAs can meet properly the chemical stability requirement as mild absorption supplies. In an effort to make a transparent comparability, the associated physicochemical knowledge of CH20, CH21 and CH22 have been summarized and introduced in Supplementary Tables 2 and 3.

Molecular packing in single crystals

In an effort to unveil the consequences of central unit brominating on optimized molecular geometries and packing behaviors, single-crystal X-ray diffraction measurements of CH20, CH21 and CH22 have been carried out. By use of a sluggish solvent diffusion technique, three single crystals featured with a ravishing metallic luster have been afforded (see Supplementary Word 2). Their detailed X-ray parameters and checked recordsdata concerning the construction components and structural output of the three single crystals might be present in Supplementary Desk 4, Supplementary Figs. 3638 and Supplementary Knowledge 24. As introduced in Fig. 2a, the hexyl decyl substitutions on SMAs have been omitted for clear remark. All three SMAs exhibit the same banana-curved and helical molecular geometry. Word that the distances of S…N between phenazine and bridged thiophene are ~3.3–3.4 Å for all of the three acceptors, barely smaller than the sum van der Waals radii (~3.55 Å when utilizing the values of Alvarez65) of S and N, indicating the doable noncovalent interactions between S and N in these SMAs. This may be supported by the diminished density gradient (RDG) evaluation indicated by the sunshine blue iso-surfaces between S and N atoms (Supplementary Fig. 39)66,67,68. Word that the efficient noncovalent S…O = C and S…N secondary interactions additional assure the comparatively planar conjugated backbones21,29,32. Amongst them, CH21 and CH22 exhibit a barely distorted skeleton with a bigger dihedral angle of ~11° between two finish teams than that of three.59° for CH20, which must be attributable to the bromine-induced steric hindrance on central models. From the general view in Fig. 2b, all three crystals might be categorised as triclinic methods, and extra importantly, the favorable three-dimensional (3D) molecular packing networks might be properly established. As well as, CH21 and CH22 possess rectangle-shaped voids of ~16.75 × 13.92 Å and ~16.66 × 14.03 Å, respectively, smaller than that of ~18.20 × 14.30 Å for CH20 with a rectangle-shaped void. It’s price mentioning that the favorable 3D molecular packing networks are often constructed by each central and finish models in CH-series SMAs and have been confirmed to be conducive to get superior cost separation/transport/recombination dynamics in OSCs28.

Fig. 2: Single-crystal constructions of CH20, CH21 and CH22.
figure 2

a Monomolecular single crystallographic construction of CH20, CH21 and CH22 in top- and side-view. b Single-crystal packing photographs on the highest view of CH20, CH21 and CH22. Purple, grey and blue colours spotlight the top teams (E), bridge unit (b) and central unit (C), respectively.

The varied 3D molecular packing networks for CH20, CH21 and CH22 must be on the premise of various intermolecular packing modes, which might be dramatically affected by even a little or no structural modification (like totally different halogenations) on the central unit of CH-series SMAs29. Subsequently, all of the intermolecular packing modes with intermolecular potential over 70 kJ mol1 have been extracted from single crystals of CH20, CH21 and CH22 (Fig. 3), and an in depth evaluation was introduced in Desk 1. As regards CH20 with out bromine on the central unit, three packing modes might be noticed, that are assigned to twin finish to central models (“twin E/C” mode), twin finish to bridge models (“twin E/b” mode) and central to central models (“C/C” mode). Amongst them, the “twin E/C” mode with a small π…π stacking distance of three.425 Å and an intermolecular potential of 190.5 kJ mol1 was solely noticed in CH-series SMAs to this point and performed a crucially vital position in establishing superior 3D packing networks21,29. Extra curiously, the traditional packing mode of end-to-end models (“E/E” mode), which exists broadly and even performs a extremely vital position in high-performance ITIC and Y-series SMAs1,54,61,69,70, vanishes from sight within the crystal of CH20 together with the emergence of a never-observed but additionally efficient “C/C” mode. The doable cause for forming “C/C” packing mode in CH20 could also be that the thermodynamically secure state of “C/C” packing is extra preferential in the course of the very sluggish crystallization course of as a result of apparent π-conjugated growth of the central unit. Nevertheless, with brominating on the central unit of CH20, the “C/C” packing mode disappears, and the extremely efficient “E/E” packing mode reemerges once more with a big intermolecular potential of ~129 kJ mol1. This must be ascribed to the comparatively massive steric hindrance of bromine on central models of CH21 and CH22, which considerably weakens the tendency for forming “C/C” packing mode and facilitates the formation of “E/E” packing in flip. Moreover, one other two distinctive packing modes of end-to-central models (“E/C” mode) and twin central to bridge models (“twin C/b” mode) might be additionally noticed in crystals of CH21 and CH22. Specializing in these three packing modes in CH20, CH21 and CH22, dibrominated CH22 reveals a smaller common ππ distance (“E/C” mode: 3.310 Å, “E/E” mode: 3.351 Å, “twin C/b” mode: 3.362 Å) than these of CH20 (“twin E/C” mode: 3.425 Å, “twin E/b” mode: 3.427 Å, “C/C” mode: 3.421 Å) and CH21 (“E/C” mode: 3.389 Å, “E/E” mode: 3.421 Å, “twin C/b” mode: 3.435 Å). This may occasionally profit from the simpler BrS, Brπ or halogen bonding interactions41,49 within the crystal of CH22 regardless of the comparatively massive steric hindrance of bromine. Word that the favorable molecular packings endow with CH22-based neat movie an improved electron mobility (μe, Supplementary Fig. 40a, b) of 4.63 × 10−4 cm2 V−1 s−1, in comparison with that of CH20 (2.14 × 10−4 cm2 V−1 s−1) and CH21 (3.45 × 10−4 cm2 V−1 s−1)21,29,70.

Fig. 3: Intermolecular packing modes of CH20, CH21 and CH22.
figure 3

π-π stacking distances of interlayer involving with all of the studied intermolecular packing modes of a, b CH20, c, d CH21 and e, f CH22, respectively. Purple, grey and blue colours spotlight the top teams (E), bridge unit (b) and central unit (C), respectively.

Desk 1 Crystallographic and π-π interplay parameters of CH20, CH21 and CH22

Additionally, in an effort to unveil the change tendency of exciton binding power (Eb), we took a number of single-crystal constructions of CH-series SMAs to theoretical calculations and made a comparability with typical Y6 within the gasoline part (Supplementary Fig. 41 and Supplementary Desk 5). Because of this, the Eb of CH-series SMAs is far decrease than that of Y6 and, extra importantly, additionally decreases with halogenation on central models, reminiscent of from Y6 to CH20 and CH22. It’s well-known that Eb is influenced by not solely molecular constructions but additionally solid-state polarization results and intermolecular digital interactions34,71. Subsequently, the calculated values of Eb proven in Supplementary Desk 5 are dramatically bigger than that noticed within the stable part based mostly on the temperature-varying photoluminescence (PL) spectra72. As displayed in Fig. 4, all of the CH-series SMAs possess a significantly smaller experimental Eb (~100 meV) than that of 226 meV for the Y6 movie, indicating some great benefits of expanded conjugation of central models. Extra importantly, Eb might lower with halogenation on the central unit of CH-series SMAs, making it excessive potential for reaching a a lot smaller Eb (even akin to inorganic semiconductors) if additional halogenation on the central unit is carried out to delicately tune each molecular constructions and intermolecular packing modes.

Fig. 4: The experimental exciton binding power of SMAs.
figure 4

The temperature-dependent PL spectra of a Y6, b CH20, c CH13, d CH23 and e CH22 neat movies. f Temperature-dependent knowledge of built-in depth.

To sum up, CH20 with a non-brominated central unit was noticed with a robust intermolecular packing mode of “C/C” as a result of nice π-conjugated extension of the central unit, thus suppressing the formation of the traditional packing mode of “E/E”. After brominating on the central unit, the “C/C” packing mode disappears, and the extremely efficient “E/E” packing mode reemerges, indicating that the brominating on the central unit of SMAs has a profound impact on intermolecular packing behaviors. Extra importantly, the “E/E” packing mode has been confirmed to play a really essential position in establishing the favorable 3D molecular packing networks of SMAs and thus results in extra environment friendly cost transport. Subsequently, on such a superb molecular platform of CH-series SMAs, brominating on a central unit slightly than an finish unit might higher stability the totally different intermolecular packing modes and afford a a lot smaller Eb, thus maximizing some great benefits of bromination (like excessive crystallinity, environment friendly halogen bonding, and so forth.) whereas circumventing its hostile results on molecular packings.

Photovoltaic performances

The varied intermolecular packing modes of those SMAs ought to result in a lot totally different photovoltaic performances of ensuing OSCs in idea. Thus, OSCs featured with a tool structure of ITO/PEDOT:PSS/lively layer/PNDIT-F3N/Ag have been fabricated, wherein a polymeric donor PM64 was blended with CH20, CH21 and CH22 to compose lively layers due to its matched power ranges and absorptions (Supplementary Fig. 42). Detailed machine fabrication and characterization procedures have been offered in Supplementary Info (Supplementary Tables 68). The present density-voltage (JV) traits of the optimum OSCs are proven in Fig. 5a and illustrated in Desk 2. For CH20-based binary OSCs, a PCE of 16.79% with a VOC of 0.881 V, a JSC of 25.44 mA cm2 and an FF of 74.92% is delivered. Benefiting from the optimized molecular packings tuned by brominating on central models, a significantly improved PCE of 18.12% is yielded by a CH21-based machine accompanied by a VOC of 0.873 V, a JSC of 26.57 mA cm2 and an FF of 78.13%. Extra excitingly, a champion PCE of 19.06% is additional generated by CH22-based OSCs featured with a VOC of 0.884 V, a JSC of 26.74 mA cm2 and an impressive FF of 80.62%, which has been ranked among the many first-class OSCs to this point10,11 and in addition reached one of the best PCE for CH-series SMAs-based OSCs21,28. The statistic effectivity evaluation for 15 unbiased OSCs (see the detailed machine parameters in Supplementary Tables 911) was inset in Fig. 5a, and the typical efficiency from CH20 to CH22 additionally reveals an enlarged tendency. The corresponding exterior quantum effectivity (EQE) plots of CH20-, CH21- and CH22-based gadgets have been displayed in Fig. 5b. Word that the built-in present densities derived from EQE plots are 24.69, 25.99, and 26.17 mA cm2, respectively, which matched properly with these afforded by J-V checks (inside 3% error). Though the regularly blue-shifted absorption from CH20 to CH22 renders a stepwise shrunken EQEs spectra, the general larger EQE responses within the vary of 450–850 nm for CH22 contribute to the biggest built-in present densities. Word that the various EQE values are concerned with a number of components, such because the efficiencies of sunshine harvest, exciton dissociation, cost transport, and so forth. Herein, the simpler exciton dissociation attributable to a comparatively massive driving drive (Fig. 1f) and facilitated cost transport induced by superior nanoscale movie morphologies (see the detailed discussions beneath) for CH22 ought to account for its finest EQEs and built-in present density. As well as, the considerably improved FF for CH22-based OSCs must be attributable to facilitated cost transport. Additionally it is price noting that PCEs of PM6:CH22-based OSCs might be maintained above 96% and ~85% in comparison with its preliminary PCEs after 1500 h underneath room temperature and 400 h underneath warmth therapy at 65 °C (Supplementary Fig. 43), respectively. The great storage and thermal stabilities of PM6:CH22 system spotlight its potential for commercialization in large-scale manufacturing of high-performance OSCs.

Fig. 5: Photovoltaic performances of the optimized OSCs.
figure 5

a Present density-voltage curves of PM6:CH20, PM6:CH21 and PM6:CH22-based OSCs; the inset reveals a statistical evaluation of machine effectivity. b The EQE plots and built-in JSC curves. c Jph versus Veff curves of PM6:CH20, PM6:CH21 and PM6:CH22-based OSCs. d Histograms of the opening and electron mobility of blended movies.

Desk 2 Abstract of machine parameters for optimized OSCs[a]

In an effort to confirm the distinctive benefits of brominating on the central unit slightly than finish teams, as we’ve mentioned above, we additional constructed the SMAs of CH22-6Br with di-bromination on each central unit and finish teams. As proven in Supplementary Fig. 44 and Supplementary Desk 12, CH22-6Br solely achieved a PCE of 17.00% with considerably decreased JSC and FF in comparison with these of CH22, which can be attributable to not solely the extreme molecular aggregation but additionally the much less compact π-π stacking of molecules as a result of comparatively bigger steric hindrance of bromine than its homomorphic fluorine or chlorine. The extreme molecular aggregation of CH22-6Br might be confirmed by the comparatively bigger fiber measurement (12.7 nm for PM6:CH22-6Br, 11.9 nm for PM6:CH22) based mostly on a statistical evaluation of atomic drive microscopy (AFM) part photographs (Supplementary Fig. 45) and barely higher crystal coherence size (CCL) of 23.37 Å in CH22-6Br neat movie estimated from GIWAXS (Supplementary Fig. 46 and Supplementary Desk 13) evaluating to that of CH22 (22.53 Å). Furthermore, the marginally bigger π-π stacking distances for CH22-6Br (3.74 and three.70 Å for neat and blended movies) might be estimated from GIWAXS in comparison with that of CH22 (3.66 and three.63 Å for neat and blended movies), which can be attributable to the comparatively bigger steric hindrance of bromine.

To additional perceive the elemental causes for JSC and FF enlargement in CH21- and CH22-based gadgets with respect to that of CH20, each the efficiencies for exciton dissociation (Pdiss) and cost assortment (Pcoll) have been first investigated (Fig. 5c). In contrast with that of 95.67%/84.52% for CH20-based machine, the values of Pdiss/Pcoll might be estimated as 96.76%/86.60% and 98.70%/90.94% for CH21- and CH22-based gadgets, respectively. The improved Pdiss must be ascribed to the downshifted HOMO power ranges of CH21 and CH22, which is able to theoretically result in a bigger driving drive for exciton splitting9,34. As well as, the enlarged Pcoll for CH21 and CH22-based gadgets must be attributed to superior cost transportation dynamics35. This may be manifested by the smaller cost extraction time of 0.32 μs for CH22 and 0.39 μs for CH21-based gadgets in comparison with that of 0.48 μs for CH20-based one (see the transient photocurrent decay curves in Supplementary Fig. 47). As we’ve mentioned above, the higher polarizability and stronger delocalization impact with the introduction of bromine on SMAs are anticipated to end in stronger intermolecular interactions and elevated cost mobility. Subsequently, the electron/gap mobilities (μe/μh) of PM6:CH20-, PM6:CH21- and PM6:CH22-based gadgets have been evaluated by using the space-charge restricted present (SCLC) technique, which might be decided to be 5.10/2.87, 6.13/3.72 and 6.81/4.43 × 10−4 cm2 V−1 s−1 comparable to μeh ratios of 1.78, 1.65 and 1.54, respectively (Fig. 5d and Supplementary Fig. 40c, d). Such outcomes point out that the CH22 system with the strongest polarizability and largest dipole second amongst these three SMAs might successfully optimize the cost separation and transport dynamics to additional enhance JSC and FF in corresponding gadgets.

Morphology evaluation

Because it has been broadly mentioned, the morphology of blended movies in OSCs performs even a dominant position in cost transport conduct and photovoltaic efficiency11,31. Subsequently, we carried out the AFM and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) measurements (Supplementary Figs. 48 and 49) to unveil the nanoscale morphology of blended movies. As proven in Supplementary Fig. 48a, all of the blended movies possess a uniform and clean floor. The values of root-mean-square (RMS) roughness of PM6:CH20 (1.02 nm), PM6:CH21 (1.13 nm) and PM6:CH22 (1.22 nm) elevated with the gradual introduction of bromine on the central unit as a result of enhanced molecular crystallinity from CH20 to CH22. In view of the part photographs (Supplementary Fig. 48b), fiber-like domains with correct sizes have been noticed, which has been confirmed to successfully facilitate cost transport in OSCs19. Based mostly on a statistical evaluation of nanofiber measurement in Supplementary Fig. 48c, d, a barely however regularly elevated fiber measurement might be noticed with 10.7 for CH20, 11.5 for CH21 and 11.9 nm for CH22, suggesting that brominating on central models might improve molecular crystallinity and fine-tune part area sizes. In the meantime, TEM photographs (Supplementary Fig. 49) additional corroborate the fibrillar community construction in all blended movies, which is conducive to reaching excessive cost mobility and avail cost transport. Word that the nanofiber measurement is said to the miscibility between PM6 and SMAs; thereby, contact angles and derived Flory-Huggins interplay parameters (χ)73,74 for the corresponding donor and acceptor have been additional evaluated. As proven in Supplementary Fig. 50 and Supplementary Desk 14, χD:A for PM6:CH22 (0.74) and PM6:CH21 (0.63) are bigger than that of PM6:CH20 (0.46), indicating decrease D/A miscibility after brominating on the central unit of SMAs13. This may occasionally contribute to the upper area purity and bigger nanofiber measurement, which is in good accordance with outcomes from AFM and TEM photographs.

Then, the impact of brominating on a central unit of SMAs on molecular packing and orientation in neat and blended movies was studied by using GIWAXS. The 2D-GIWAXS patterns and line-cut profiles of CH20, CH21 and CH22 neat movies are introduced in Fig. 6, and corresponding parameters are summarized in Supplementary Desk 15. All of the neat movies for CH20, CH21 and CH22 exhibit pronounced (010) diffraction peaks positioned at 1.663, 1.690 and 1.718 Å−1 in out-of-plane (OOP) path and sharp (100) diffraction peaks at 0.423, 0.418, 0.410 Å−1 in in-plane (IP) path, respectively, indicating the preferential face-on orientations. Word that CH22 shows the extra distinguished (010) diffraction peaks with barely shifted to larger q area, assigned to a shorter π-π stacking distance of three.66 Å than these of three.78 Å for CH20 and three.72 Å for CH21, which is in good accordance with the evaluation of single crystals (Supplementary Fig. 51). In the meantime, a comparable however barely bigger CCL of twenty-two.53 Å might be noticed for CH22 neat movie evaluating to these of 21.10 Å for CH20 and 21.18 Å for CH21, indicating the improved molecular packing ordering. After mixing with the PM6 donor, the sharp (010) diffraction peaks and (100) diffraction peaks can nonetheless be noticed in OOP and IP instructions, respectively, suggesting that the fascinating face-on orientation might be properly maintained. As it’s summarized in Supplementary Desk 15, the (010) diffraction peaks within the OOP path for 3 blended movies are positioned at 1.713, 1.718 and 1.733 Å−1, assigned to the π-π stacking distances of three.67, 3.66 and three.63 Å, respectively. In the meantime, CCLs of (010) diffraction peaks have been estimated to be 22.00, 22.09 and 22.44 Å for PM6:CH20, PM6:CH21 and PM6:CH22 blended movies, respectively. Typically, the extra compact π-π stacking and barely enhanced molecular packing order for CH22 movies must be contributed to the improved molecular crystallinity and response for the superior cost transport behaviors and even enlarged JSC and FF values in CH22-based OSCs75. Furthermore, the Urbach power (Eu) values have been calculated to be 20.7, 20.1 and 19.3 meV for CH20-, CH21- and CH22-based gadgets, respectively, by becoming the Fourier remodel photocurrent spectrometer EQE (FTPS-EQE) (Supplementary Fig. 52). The smaller Eu of PM6:CH22 additionally suggests the extra ordered molecular packing, which agrees properly with its barely bigger CCL76. All the outcomes above manifested that the delicately brominating on central models of SMAs might give rise to enhanced molecular crystallinity, extra compact intermolecular packings and crystalline orders, thus rendering extra environment friendly cost transport behaviors and higher photovoltaic efficiency.

Fig. 6: GIWAXS characterization of the neat movies and blended movies.
figure 6

a 2D GIWAXS patterns of CH20, CH21 and CH22 neat movies and b optimized PM6:CH20, PM6:CH21 and PM6:CH22 blended movies. c The corresponding in-plane (IP) and out-of-plane (OOP) extracted line-cut profiles of CH20, CH21 and CH22-based neat and blended movies.

Power loss evaluation

To check the affect of central unit brominating on power loss (Eloss) of SMAs, all three SMAs gadgets have been ready. The full Eloss for PM6:CH20, PM6:CH21 and PM6:CH22 methods are 0.495, 0.525 and 0.530 eV, respectively (see Supplementary Word 3 and Supplementary Figs. 53 and 54 for the detailed calculations). Word that CH21 and CH22 methods with brominating on central models afford the marginally bigger Eloss (Fig. 7, Supplementary Desk 16), particularly non-radiative recombination loss ((Delta {V}_{{nr}})). By becoming the low-energy area of extremely delicate EQE and EL spectra (Supplementary Fig. 54), the power degree (({E}_{{CT}})) of cost switch (CT) state might be decided to be 1.35, 1.35 and 1.37 eV for PM6:CH20, PM6:CH21, PM6:CH22 blended movies, respectively, giving rise to power offsets ((Delta {E}_{{CT}})) between native exciton state (LE) and CT state of 0.026, 0.043 and 0.044 eV. With such a CT state power close to to that of LE, the extremely doable hybridization of LE and CT states must be considered77,78. Word that the smaller (Delta {E}_{{CT}}) for CH20 than these of CH21 and CH22 might end in simpler hybridization of LE and CT states, thus enhancing the luminescence of the CT state by the “depth borrowing” mechanism29,78 and additional suppressing the non-radiative recombination price of CT states. This can be the rationale that CH20-based OSC displays a diminished non-radiative recombination loss in comparison with that of CH21 and CH22-based ones. As well as, the comparatively bigger electron reorganization energies of 147.23 for CH21 and 148.87 for CH22 than that of 144.59 meV for CH20 might be noticed (Supplementary Fig. 55), which must be attributable to the simply polarizing property of bromine and in addition partially account for the bigger Eloss for CH21 and CH22-based OSCs. That is vital as it’s well-known {that a} small power loss must be rationally pursued on the premise of environment friendly cost switch/transport dynamics. Subsequently, a well-balanced trade-off between JSC and VOC is extremely fascinating, particularly within the state-of-the-art OSCs. As displayed in Fig. 7c, the CH22-based machine achieved essentially the most compromise between tangle JSC and VOC despite its comparatively bigger power loss with respect to that of CH20, thus rendering one of the best FF to succeed in the optimum effectivity.

Fig. 7: Power loss evaluation of the optimized OSCs and the thick-film machine efficiency of PM6:CH22.
figure 7

a A schematic diagram of Eloss-related parameters. b Statistical diagram of detailed Eloss of CH20, CH21 and CH22-based gadgets. c VOC×JSC vs FF of CH20, CH21 and CH22-based 15 independently measured OSCs. d A abstract of the PCE for thick-film OSCs with ~500 nm. e Present density-voltage curves of PM6:CH22-based OSCs with totally different thicknesses (100 nm, 220 nm, 310 nm, 405 nm, and 505 nm). f The corresponding EQE spectra.

Thick-film machine efficiency

As everyone knows, the overwhelming majority of high-performance OSCs are obtained with a layer thickness of ~100 nm and PCEs will lower drastically with rising thickness of lively layers, which significantly limits their utility in massive space printing course of utilizing essentially the most promising know-how of roll to roll79. Thus, it is vitally vital to develop high-performance OSCs with good tolerance of lively layer thickness. It’s well-known that light-harvesting supplies with excessive crystallinity and mobility are useful to acquire higher efficiency with thick movies80. Subsequently, CH22 is anticipated to realize a passable efficiency in thick-film gadgets in mild of its compact molecular packings and excessive crystallinity. Bearing these ideas in thoughts, PM6:CH22 gadgets with totally different lively layer thicknesses (~200, ~300, ~400 and ~500 nm) have been fabricated. The obtained JV traits and EQE plots have been introduced in Fig. 7e, f, and the detailed parameters are listed in Supplementary Desk 17. With movie thickness rising, the JSC of CH22-based OSCs improves regularly, however FF declines significantly. Because of this, an eventual PCE of 15.70% is afforded by making use of a ~500 nm movie thickness of CH22-based OSC, demonstrating the very best PCE for OSCs with lively layer thickness as much as 500 nm (Supplementary Desk 18). Word that the significantly decreased FF could also be attributable to the extra trap-assisted recombination in thicker-film gadgets, urged by elevated S/(kT/q) values from 1.08 to 1.26 and diminished Pcoll from 90.94 to 80.68% for OSCs with a movie thickness from 100 to 500 nm (Supplementary Fig. 56).



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here